Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(4): 645-654, July-Aug. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-794680

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction: To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) for the treatment of the large proximal ureteral stone. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was performed in June 2015 using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Article selection proceeded according to the search strategy based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis criteria. Results: Six RCT including 646 patients were analyzed, 325 URS cases (50.3%) and 321 LU cases (49.7%). URS provided a significantly shorter operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = −31.26 min; 95%CI −46.88 to −15.64; p<0.0001) and length of hospital stay (WMD = −1.48 days; 95%CI −2.78 to −0.18; p=0.03) than LU. There were no significant differences in terms of overall complications (OR = 0.78; 95%CI 0.21-2.92; p=0.71) and major complications – Clavien ≥3 – (OR = 1.79; 95%CI 0.59-5.42; p=0.30). LU led to a significantly higher initial stone-free rate (OR = 8.65; 95%CI 4.18-17.91; p<0.00001) and final stone-free rate (OR = 6.41; 95%CI 2.24-18.32; p=0.0005) than URS. There was a significantly higher need for auxiliary procedures in URS cases (OR = 6.58; 95%CI 3.42-12.68; p<0.00001). Conclusions: Outcomes with LU for larger proximal ureteral calculi are favorable compared to semi-rigid URS and should be considered as a first-line alternative if flexible ureteroscopy is not available. Utilization of flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with semi-rigid ureteroscopy may impact these outcomes, and deserves further systematic evaluation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Lithotripsy/methods , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Ureteroscopy/methods , Time Factors , Ureter/surgery , Ureteral Calculi/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Evidence-Based Medicine/classification
2.
Korean Journal of Urology ; : 455-460, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-95907

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the association of several factors with spontaneous stone expulsion, including ureteral stone characteristics (size, location, hydronephrosis, perinephric stranding), types of medications prescribed (alpha-blocker, low-dose steroid), and other possible demographic and health-history factors (gender, age, serum creatinine, underlying diabetes mellitus [DM], and hypertension). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 366 patients with ureteral stones were enrolled. All patients underwent watchful waiting without any invasive procedures. Initial diagnoses of ureteral stones were confirmed by computed tomography scans, which were taken at approximately 1-month intervals to check for stone expulsion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify significant factors that contributed to stone expulsion. RESULTS: Among 366 patients, 335 patients (91.5%) experienced spontaneous stone passage during a mean follow-up period of 2.95+/-2.62 weeks. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the success of spontaneous stone passage. Univariate analyses revealed that stone location (p=0.003), stone size (p=0.021), and underlying DM (p<0.001) were significant predictors of stone passage. Multivariate analyses confirmed that stone size (p=0.010), stone location (p=0.008), and underlying DM (p=0.003) were independent predictive factors affecting stone passage. CONCLUSIONS: Stone size, location, and underlying DM were confirmed to be significant predictive factors for spontaneous passage of ureteral stones. Urologists should consider active procedures, such as shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy, rather than conservative management in patients presenting with proximally located stones, large ureteral stones, or underlying DM.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Diabetes Complications/therapy , Prognosis , Remission, Spontaneous , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Ureteral Calculi/pathology , Watchful Waiting
3.
Korean Journal of Urology ; : 475-481, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-178072

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of laparoscopic pyelo- and ureterolithotomies with the aid of flexible nephroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 71 patients with complex renal stones or large and impacted proximal ureteral stones. Patients underwent laparoscopic pyelo- or ureterolithotomies with or without the removal of small residual stones by use of flexible nephroscopy between July 2005 and July 2010. Operative success was defined as no residual stones in the intravenous pyelogram at 12 weeks postoperatively. Perioperative results and surgical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 54.7+/-13.7 years, and 53 males (74.6%) and 18 females (25.4%) were included. The mean maximal stone size was 19.4+/-9.4 mm. A total of 47 cases were complex renal stones and 24 cases were impacted ureteral stones. Mean operative time was 139.0+/-63.7 minutes. Stones were completely removed in 61 cases (85.9%), and no further ancillary treatment was needed for clinically insignificant residual fragments in 7 cases (9.9%). For complex renal stones, the complete stone-free rate and clinically significant stone-free rate were 80.9% and 93.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the use of flexible nephroscopy for complex renal stones can reduce the risk of residual stones. A major complication occurred in one case, in which open conversion was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic stone surgery is a safe and minimally invasive procedure with a high success rate, especially with the aid of flexible nephroscopy, and is not associated with procedure-specific complications.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Kidney Calculi/pathology , Laparoscopy/methods , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ureteral Calculi/pathology
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 39(2): 203-208, Mar-Apr/2013. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-676260

ABSTRACT

Purpose Emergency double-J (DJ) stenting following “uncomplicated” ureteroscopic (UURS) stone treatment is both morbid and costly. Our study aims at identifying those patients who are more likely to require such an extra procedure. Handling of this complication will also be highlighted. Materials and Methods 319 cases of UURS cases were selected out of 903 patients, who were admitted for URS stone treatment at King Abdullah University Hospital during the period from May, 2003 to December, 2010. Thirty-eight of them (11.9%) had emergency post-URS DJ stenting within 24 hours of discharge. The medical records of all UURS cases were retrospectively reviewed. Comparison in demographic and stone-related variables was made using 2-paired t-test with P < 0.05. Operative findings of 38 stented patients were outlined. Results Significant risk factors for emergency stenting were noted in males with larger (>1.5 cm) and proximal stones (38 stented vs. 281 unstented). Operative risk factors among the 38 patients were: initial procedure time > 45 minutes (42.1%), ureteral wall edema (21.1%), repeated access for stones > 1.5 cm (21.1%), impacted stone (10.5%) and ignored or missed stones/fragments (4.6%). Conclusions The need for emergency DJ stenting following UURS stone treatment is not uncommon. The routine insertion is impractical and weakly-supported. With risk-factor stratification, selective and individualized DJ stenting policy is recommended. .


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stents , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Ureteroscopy/methods , Emergencies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ureteral Calculi/pathology , Urethral Obstruction/surgery
5.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 38(1): 63-68, Jan.-Feb. 2012. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-623316

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In nowadays there is no consensus on single-session ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) for the management of bilateral ureteric stones. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of single-session URSL in patients with bilateral ureteric stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 41 patients who have undergone bilateral single-session URSL were evaluted in this study. A 8/9.8 Fr Wolf semi-rigid ureteroscope was used for the procedures, and the stones were fragmented with pneumatic lithotripter. RESULTS: A high stone-free rate was achieved (90.2%) after single endoscopic procedure with a retreatment rate of 9.8%. The procedure was most successful for distal ureteric stones with a 96.2% stone-free rate followed by middle ureteric stones with a 81.8% stone-free rate while the least success was achieved for proximal ureteric stones with a 77.7% stone-free rate (p < 0.05). A greater stone-free rate was obtained in those with stones less than 10 mm (93.7%) than in those with stones larger than 10 mm (77.7%) (p < 0.05). Ureteral perforation occurred in only one patient (2.4 %). No long-term complication was observed in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral single-session URSL can be performed effectively and safely with a low complication rate in patients with bilateral ureteric stones. It can reduce the need of anaesthetics and hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Lithotripsy/methods , Postoperative Complications , Ureter/surgery , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Ureteroscopy/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ureteral Calculi/pathology , Ureteral Calculi/therapy
7.
Clinics ; 65(10): 961-965, 2010. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-565977

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Two different regimens of SWL delivery for treating urinary stones were compared. METHODS: Patients with urinary stones were randomly divided into two groups, one of which received 3000 shocks at a rate of 60 impulses per minute and the other of which received 4000 shocks at 90 impulses per minute. Success was defined as stone-free status or the detection of residual fragments of less than or equal to 3 mm three months after treatment. Partial fragmentation was considered to have occurred if a significant reduction in the stone burden was observed but residual fragments of 3mm or greater remained. RESULTS: A total of 143 procedures were performed with 3000 impulses at a rate of 60 impulses per minute, and 156 procedures were performed with 4000 impulses at 90 impulses per minute. The stone-free rate was 53.1 percent for patients treated with the first regimen and 54.8 percent for those treated with the second one (p = 0.603). The stone-free rate for stones smaller than 10 mm was 60 percent for patients treated with 60 impulses per minute and 58.6 percent for those treated with 90 impulses per minute. For stones bigger than 10 mm, stone-free rates were 34.2 percent and 45.7 percent, respectively (p = 0.483). Complications occurred in 2.3 percent of patients treated with 60 impulses per minute and 3.3 percent of patients treated with 90 impulses per minute. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in the stone-free and complication rates were observed by reducing the total number of impulses from 4000 to 3000 and the frequency from 90 to 60 impulses per minute.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Lithotripsy/methods , Ureteral Calculi/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Ureteral Calculi/pathology
8.
Rev. chil. urol ; 68(3): 341-345, 2003. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-395082

ABSTRACT

Se podría decir que al comenzar el nuevo siglo, a lo menos existen dudas razonables sobre qué método es el ideal para resolver el difícil problema de litiasis ureteral baja. Este trabajo pretende contribuir con esta discusión. Se presenta experiencia personal de 11 años de ureteroscopía en el manejo de litiasis del uréter bajo. Se incluyeron en este trabajo prospectivo a todos los pacientes portadores de litiasis ureteral baja, sin ningún tipo de selección y con indicación quirúrgica, desde enero de 1990 hasta junio del 2001. La población estudiada comprendió a 186 pacientes con rangos de edad de 18-62 años. Todos los pacientes fueron tratados con anestesia regional y profilaxis antibiótica pre operatoria. El tamaño promedio de los cálculosfue de 5,6 mm, con rangos entre 3 y 18 mm. En 8 pacientes (4 porciento), el procedimiento fracasó por incapacidad de traspasar el uréter intramural, incluyendo una desinserción del uréter y tres laceraciones de la mucosa ureteral. En los otros cuatro pacientes de este grupo, no fue posible traspasar el fenómeno inflamatorio que se antepone al cálculo. Los 8 pacientes fueron operados de inmediato. El porcentaje de éxito global fue de un 96 porciento. El tiempo promedio de la cirugía fue de 24 minutos, con rangos de 15 a 120 minutos. No se utilizó radioscopía. El 95 porciento de los pacientes permaneció un día hospitalizado. La principal complicación post operatoria fue el cólico renal, en un 12 porciento de los pacientes. Un 20 porciento de los pacientes requirió fragmentación ultrasónica o neumática. No existió sepsis, pérdida de unidades renales, ni mortalidad quirúrgica. La ureteroscopía es un eficiente método de tratamiento en el manejo de la litiasis del uréter bajo, y es una técnica segura, luego de una adecuada curva de aprendizaje.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Middle Aged , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Ureteroscopy/methods , Ureteral Calculi/pathology , Colic/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects , Ureteroscopes
9.
Journal of Korean Medical Science ; : 796-800, 2001.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-147200

ABSTRACT

We report a case of primary small cell carcinoma of the ureter with squamous cell and transitional cell carcinomatous components associated with ureteral stone, which is unique in that the patient has remained free of tumor recurrence for 36 months after the surgery without adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. A 60-yr-old man presented himself with a right flank pain. Computed tomography revealed an ill-defined mass and a stone in the lower one third of the right ureter, and hydronephroureterosis above the stone-impacted site. The patient underwent right nephroureterectomy and stone removal. Upon gross examination, a 3.8 x 1.8 x 1.2 cm white and partly yellow mass was noted in the anterior part of the ureter, resulting in indentation of the ureteral lumen on the posterior side. Light microscopic examination revealed that the mass was mainly composed of small cell carcinoma, and partly squamous cell and transitional cell carcinomatous components. The overlying ureteral mucosa and renal pelvis also contained multifocal dysplastic transitional epithelium and transitional cell carcinoma in situ. There was no vascular invasion, and the surgical margins were free of tumor. The small cell carcinomatous component was positive for chromogranin, neuron specific enolase, synaptophysin, and pancytokeratin but negative for high molecular-weight cytokeratin (K-903) by immunohistochemistry.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Carcinoma, Small Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ureteral Calculi/pathology , Ureteral Neoplasms/pathology
10.
JPMI-Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute. 1999; 13 (1): 149-50
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-51359
11.
Journal of Korean Medical Science ; : 48-50, 1995.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-218188

ABSTRACT

A 55-year-old woman suffered from right flank pain and had a right giant ureteral stone with hydronephrosis. Ureterolithotomy was performed. The ureteral stone was 11cm long and weighed 45gm.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Hydronephrosis/surgery , Middle Aged , Ureteral Calculi/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL